Automotive

Bugatti's AWD hybrid drivetrain is pretty nuts

Bugatti's AWD hybrid drivetrain is pretty nuts
A cutaway of the Bugatti Tourbillon showing the T-shaped battery back and electric motors up front
A cutaway of the Bugatti Tourbillon showing the T-shaped battery back and electric motors up front
View 6 Images
The 800-volt electric motor makes over 300 hp and integrates directly into the Bugatti Tourbillon's transmission ... no need for a 12 volt starter motor!
1/6
The 800-volt electric motor makes over 300 hp and integrates directly into the Bugatti Tourbillon's transmission ... no need for a 12 volt starter motor!
The entire engine, transmission, and electric motor. It's significantly lighter than the W16 with transmission
2/6
The entire V16 engine, transmission, and electric motor. It's significantly lighter than the W16 with transmission
A cutaway of the Bugatti Tourbillon showing the T-shaped battery back and electric motors up front
3/6
A cutaway of the Bugatti Tourbillon showing the T-shaped battery back and electric motors up front
Dyno screen of one of the electric motors as it's spooling its way up to 24,000 rpm
4/6
Dyno screen of one of the electric motors as it's spooling its way up to 24,000 rpm
The coverless battery pack
5/6
The coverless battery pack
A CAD design of the battery pack in the Tourbillon
6/6
A CAD design of the battery pack in the Tourbillon
View gallery - 6 images

When the Bugatti Tourbillon took center stage in June of 2024, nearly everything written about it (including the piece I wrote) fawned over its meticulous dash, its beautiful curves, and included every chrono-pun one could think of. Finally, Bugatti has given us a peek at what's actually under the hood.

And whoa! It's not just good, it's an engineering marvel (much like the Tourbillon's dash). Sure, every high-end exotic car company is in a constant race to outdo one another – better engine, better aero, more grip, more technology, and so on ... But what Bugatti has done with the Tourbillon is a masterpiece of mechanical integration for saving space and weight, and turning the efficiency dial to 13 ... you know ... because analog clocks only go to 12 ...

If you read my previous pieces on Koenigsegg's Light Speed Tourbillon Transmission (to Koenigsegg's credit, it used the name "Tourbillon" a full year before Bugatti unveiled its car) or the 800-hp Dark Matter electric motor in the Gemera, you know I have a love for all things motor. Both internal combustion engines and electric motors have their pros and cons and each has a time and place ... in the case of Bugatti's latest flagship hypercar, that time and place is together in the Tourbillon.

The entire engine, transmission, and electric motor. It's significantly lighter than the W16 with transmission
The entire V16 engine, transmission, and electric motor. It's significantly lighter than the W16 with transmission

Bugatti's now-signature naturally aspirated V16 sits in the rear of the Tourbillon. Mated to that beautiful 968-hp (735-kW) V16 is an torque-vectoring 8-speed dual-clutch transmission and a 335-hp (250-kW) electric pulling triple duty: a starter, a generator, and a torque booster.

If I didn't make it clear earlier, this Bugatti is all about integration.

Bugatti has used a quad-turbo setup since the EB110, launched back in 1991. In 2005, the quad-turbo, W16-engined, 253-mph (407-km/h) Veyron hit the street. Then every two years came a new Veyron: The Grand Sport, the Super Sport (which held the world speed record for a bit), followed by the Grand Sport Vitesse. Each pretty much looked the same, just a tad faster.

By 2016, the Bugatti Chiron was born, also sporting the quad-turbo W16. Four more Chiron iterations were made through 2024, including the track-focused Divo, the one-off and world's most expensive car at the time Bugatti La Voiture Noire (which translates roughly to "I am Batmannnn!"), the US$8.8-million Bugatti Centodieci, and the track only Bugatti Bolide (can you say 300-plus mph?). The first Bugatti-Rimac collaboration and the last of the quad-turbo 8-liter W16 line was the 2024 Bugatti Mistral.

Gone is the heavier W16 and gone is the weight and complication of four turbos and associated plumbing. The Tourbillon was even able to shed two radiators from previous W16 Bugatti models. Its eight radiators handle everything from high and low-temp loops to oil cooling – which is how Bugatti cools the Tourbillon's batteries that power its three identically spec'd electric motors.

A cutaway of the Bugatti Tourbillon showing the T-shaped battery back and electric motors up front
A cutaway of the Bugatti Tourbillon showing the T-shaped battery back and electric motors up front

It gets to be a bit more magical with what's happening up front. Similar to the Dark Matter in the Koenigsegg, a single housing unit sits between the front tires – and that's where the similarities end. In it are two gearboxes and two electric motors, each connected to its own wheel giving the Tourbillon all-wheel drive. Each electric motor pumps out 335 hp and spools up to an incredible 24,000 rpm, focused more on high-speed lightweight efficiency as opposed to low-end torque.

Did I mention integration?

The coverless battery pack
The coverless battery pack

The T-shaped 800-volt battery that powers the EV side of things doesn't even have a case. It would weigh too much to fashion a battery cover – instead, the monocoque body of the Tourbillon is the case. Its 1,500-plus cells will get around 37 miles (60 km) of range in pure EV mode, not that range is a priority for the Tourbillon ... more like zero engine lag, crazy speed and power, and the most efficient, compact, lightweight design possible for pure performance.

Is it even a hybrid anymore? Or a harmony?

BUGATTI - A NEW ERA: Hybrid Power

Source: Bugatti

If you bought a Bugatti through one of our links, we won't get any commission – but it would be pretty cool if we did!

View gallery - 6 images
8 comments
8 comments
BeeCurious
This car is ridiculous. Look at the size of that godawful dirty and unnecessarily complicated engine wedded to outdated tech. Yeah, it’s beautiful like steam engines were beautiful but we’ve all moved on and enjoy them in museums and as kids adventure rides not cluttering up the tracks in the way of faster, cleaner, better electric machines.
Steam trains were beautiful in a lets-blow-up-and-waste-enormous-energy-kind-of-way but utterly ridiculous in their inefficiency. 95% of the energy in the coal was lost as heat and pollution and just dumped into the air.
The NYC Niagra class steam train (one of the fastest commercial trains developed at the end of the era) burned about 133 pounds of coal per mile or about half a pound per passenger per mile. The NY to Chicago route (928 miles) would burn about 460 lb or about a quarter of a US tonne of coal per person! And it went about 60mph.
Modern electric trains are so superior that even if powered ultimately by coal via coal power plants they use one sixth of the coal and no pollution at the point of use and some can go over 350 mph. Of course, they are also switching over everywhere to renewable energy. Sweden’s run entirely on green power for example so no no carbon pollution.
This ridiculous Bugatti looks to me like the work of an ageing leadership that refuses to change and insists on selling steam-powered cars after Henry Ford arrived.
ICE engines are 30-40% efficient and always will be. It is 150 year old mature tech that can only marginally improve. It’s boring hearing about these marginal improvements and annoying and immoral when that research and technical development is draining and diverting resources away feom and crowding out electric vehicles.
Electric engines are inherently 80-90% efficient and already superior on almost every metric (torque, torque control, noise level, weight distribution flexibility, etc). They’re development potential is also huge rather than marginal, if ICE tech would just get out of the way…
When I see a fossil fuel powered hypercar on the street farting carbon and other pollutants out its ass when the world desperately needs to go fossil fuel free in order to save the planet from environmental collapse, it signals to me the person who owns that car is not only arrogant and selfish but has extremely poor taste.
This Bugatti is like if Henry ford insisted on whacking a steam engine into the model T as well because ‘it has its advantages’.
Let the ICE die already so it can get out of the way. Bugatti, show you’re not myopically wedded to the past and ready to change. Your customers might need some pushing too but luckily its getting harder and harder and ever more immoral and socially embarrassing to deny the overwhelming superiority of electric. ⚡️
guzmanchinky
But why?!? Just bolt 4 insanely powerful electric motors to the wheels and call it a day.
Ashley
BeeCurious - you've nailed it. Old technology needs to make way for the new! When great disruptions occur, there are always some who need to be dragged kicking and screaming to the new. Bugatti is one of them.
Dave222
@ guz agree. Christian could put a dark matter in each corner for 3.2 Mega watt total, plug in a fifty dollar Soundracer piped to interior and exterior speakers and not tell his customers the truth.
Rocky Stefano
@everyonebelow keep your electric. That's fine, I appreciate it but I will take the Bugatti please.
JS
@Dave222 - That would be INSANE! And awesome. @Rocky Stefano - I love both ICE and electric. As it stands right now, the US infrastructure (and prolly everywhere else too, but I can't say that as a fact as I haven't been EVERYWHERE else) simply is inadequate for having an electric only means of transpo. We're designed for gasoline at the moment ... which is why I too am like "I'll take the Bugatti!" Hehe.
@anyone who's reading this - Once infrastructure makes it so that an EV can go anywhere and do anything an ICE can do (be it having the necessary range or simply more charge points to compensate for lack of range), then I'll start to think of ICE as antiquated or unnecessary. But until then, ICE is still a necessary evil. I imagine most city-folk simply cannot understand that there's those of us who don't have the conveniences of charge points and the likes... those of us who live deep in the mountains or deserts, etc. You know, the kinda people who've never drank from a well or a stream as their main source of water. Or those that butcher their own animals for food... it's a very different lifestyle. Some of us even have 55 gallon drums of diesel at home to power our equipment and the likes... not 240v level 2 chargers. :)
McDesign
@BeeCurious - I'll bet you look at an intricately-cut diamond ring, and say, "Look how ridiculous - it won't even keep that single finger warm in the winter - far better this inexpensive pair of cotton gloves".
ReservoirPup
The article is written great but I'm afraid I've got a much higher esteem of Mr/Ms BeeCurious and their values than this fossil of luxurious hubris. Thanks to Mr/Ms BeeCurious for a well articulated post!